An agent that acts in your name should answer to you. LaunchPilot is built so the machine does the work and the human keeps the authority — not as a setting you switch on, but as how it's made.
No message sent, no post published, no budget spent without your explicit yes. The agent prepares and stops — it has no path to acting on its own, even for work it drafted days ago.
Emails leave from your inbox. Posts appear on your profiles. It never creates accounts for you, never signs up to services in your name, and never presents itself as someone it isn't.
Every draft is editable before it goes: recipient, subject, body. Change what's wrong, skip what shouldn't go out, or empty the whole queue. Nothing is final until you say so — and nothing expires into being sent by default.
Every action the agent took, when, on which channel, and how it turned out. Nothing hidden.
Plenty of this was technically possible. We left it out because an agent that gets your accounts banned isn't a growth tool.
It won't register for services on your behalf or create profiles to post from. You sign up; it works with what you connected.
It won't pretend to be you inside someone else's platform, or act where consent belongs to a person rather than a key.
It won't cycle through free tiers on multiple accounts to dodge limits. That breaks terms of service and gets people banned.
Outreach done badly damages the sender more than the recipient. LaunchPilot is built to keep volumes sane and messages worth reading: emails are spaced minutes apart rather than fired in a burst, each one is written for its recipient rather than templated, and the system favours a short list of good contacts over a long list of weak ones.
You remain the sender of record. The responsibility for what goes out is genuinely yours — which is exactly why the approval step exists, and why we won't remove it.